Thursday, September 27, 2012

The hamsters of evolutionary belief spin wildly on their wheels, but they are going nowhere



The creation vs. evolution debate forum called EvC Forum has been around since at least 2001.  Yet, the "achievements" of EvC Forum in terms of outreach are very modest indeed as can be seen by the graphs below.The web traffic of that web forum has been plunging too.

The owner of EvC Forum appears to be someone who goes by the username of Percy.  Percy has done over 11,000 futile posts at EvC Forum. I am guessing that the "superior evolutionist intellect" of Percy is in charge of  EvC Forum's evolutionist "outreach". 

Percy and his fellow internet evolutionists remind me of hamsters that furiously spin around in their wheel, but never really go anywhere.  For example, Gallup Inc. recently reported its largest recorded increase in biblical creation belief in the United States. 46% of Americans are now young earth creationists.  Also, global atheism/agnosticism are both shrinking while global Christianity and creationism are rapidly expanding. See: Global decline of atheism and the rise of global creationism.

Yet, despite the plunging web traffic of EvC Forum and the explosive growth of biblical creationism, Percy is afraid to accept our debate offer which would give his obscure evolutionist website and his errant evolutionist views exposure to tens of thousands of people. See: We challenge Percy to a debate!
 

They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. It appears as if Percy wants to continue to spin in his EvC Forum hamster wheel and keep banning creationists who win debate after debate. 

And we know that believers in biblical creation easily win debates with evolutionists.  Around the 1970s, prominent evolutionists lost hundreds of debates at colleges, universities and other public places.  As a result, they are now like timid little bunnies who are afraid to publicly debate.

Given the speciousness of evolutionism (see: Refuting evolution), the explosive growth of global biblical creation belief, the global shrinking of atheism/agnosticism in terms of adherents which is expected to affect the Western World and the obscurity of EvC Forum, Percy should consider himself fortunate that we will  debate someone promoting evolutionary quackery! 


Internet atheism and evolutionism is one big hamster wheel 

Would you like to see how internet atheism and evolutionism is one big hamster wheel?  Examine the resource below:

Decline of internet atheism articles

EvC Forum - Web traffic tracking graph from Compete.com for the period from 7/2011 to 7/2012:





(click graph above to see details of the graph)

EvC Forum - Web traffic tracking graph from Alexa:


Related post


The creation vs. evolution debate forum called EvC Forum appears to be dead. Creationists censored and banned due to winning debate after debate 


Question Evolution! Campaign resources and other resources:

Question Evolution! Campaign

15 questions for evolutionists

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15


My hamster can not manage to stop spinning in his wheel - video



15 Questions Evolutionists STILL can't answer! - video




 Picture credits:

1. People on wheel

Source:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/pboyd04/2524536525/

Title: DSC_1133 - Processed

Photographer: Patrick, flicker username: pboyd04

License:  Creative Commons, Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0), see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en

 2. Hamster, public domain picture, see: http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=5228&picture=adorable

7 comments:

  1. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that evolution was disproved tomorrow. Not going to happen, but I'll allow it for the purpose of this discussion.
    What would that tell us about creationism? Nothing.
    There isn't a dichotomy here. It isn't "Either the Genesis account is true, or evolutionary theory is true." Instead, the question is "What can be repeatedly tested, falsified, and confirmed to be the best answer for the diversity of species?"
    Even if you "disprove" evolution, you still have all your work cut out for you to demonstrate - via testable, falsifiable experiments and testable predictions - a reasonable alternative.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HannibalBarca,

      A few points:

      1. The evolutionary paradigm is a total failure and I believe you are probably aware of this.

      Are you willing to have a debate centered around the
      15 questions for evolutionists
      via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.

      If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: http://login.meetcheap.com/conference,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockkofgod via his YouTube email at http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod

      If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua

      2. Do you know the difference between historical science and operational science?

      See:

      http://www.icr.org/article/scientific-case-against-evolution-summary-part-1/

      http://creation.com/its-not-science

      http://creation.com/is-evolution-scientific

      3. Are the physical sciences the only field of human endeavor which provide evidence and truth? If so, why?

      Are the physical sciences the only field of human endeavor which gives us knowledge and evidence about the past? If so, why?


      See: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/evidence-for-christianity-websites-and.html

      4. Is the social science of history a valid pursuit? If not, why not

      See: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/evidence-for-christianity-websites-and.html

      5. Are you an atheist? If so, what proof and evidence do you have that atheism is true?

      Delete
  2. Are you so desperate to hear yourself talk that you're demanding to debate every random person who comments on your site?
    If you want to debate evolution (which, as I've already said, does not prove or disprove a god) how about you find an evolutionary biologist and debate him or her. You probably won't find any, and it's not because they're cowards. It's because there is no debate. There are no credible biologists who deny evolution, and that's because the evidence is overwhelming.
    Ever heard of Project Steve?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Steve

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HannibalBarca,

      1, Experience has taught me that evolutionist are blowhards who are no confident that their evolutionary beliefs can withstand cross-examination. Also, research indicates that evolution is based on a gut feeling. See: http://www.livescience.com/18051-belief-evolution-gut-feeling.html and http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/02/evolutionary-gut-feelings-belief-in.html

      2. Experience has shown me that evolutionary gut feelings do poorly in debates. And we know that believers in biblical creation easily win debates with evolutionists. Around the 1970s, prominent evolutionists lost hundreds of debates at colleges, universities and other public places. As a result, they are now like timid little bunnies who are afraid to publicly debate. See: http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC1200W1.htm

      3. Recent history teaches that many of the most ardent defenders of evolution are insincere atheists. See: http://creation.com/a-whos-who-of-evolutionists

      We also know that atheists in recent history have been very cowardly. For example, members of the British Humanist Society were afraid to debate William Lane Craig. Also, the global atheist conference in Australia were afraid to debate Creation Ministries International.

      Also, the ex-militant atheist Richard Dawkins who flip flops between atheism and agnosticism was afraid to debate William Lane Craig. See: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/07/is-richard-dawkins-flipflopper.html

      4. We know that atheists are proud and hate to admit that atheism has no proof and evidence that it is true. We also know that Christianity has proof and evidence that it is true. See: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/evidence-for-christianity-websites-and.html

      Are you an atheist? What proof and evidence do you have that atheism is true?

      5. I know you have evolutionary gut feelings. Are you willing to put your evolutionary gut feelings under cross-examination?


      Are you willing to have a debate centered around the
      15 questions for evolutionists
      via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.

      If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: http://login.meetcheap.com/conference,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod

      If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua

      There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer and carry through with the debate.

      Delete
    2. HannibalBarca,

      Addendum:

      700 scientists have joined the ranks of scientists from around the world publicly stating their doubts about the adequacy of Darwin's theory of evolution. See: http://www.discovery.org/a/2732

      In although belief in evolution is much higher among those who have been indoctrinated with it in university, there are still over 100,000 scientists world-wide who reject the evolutionary explanation. And this is despite widespread suppression of alternative views and even efforts to deny believers of alternative views positions in academia. See: http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/w/Main_Page

      The reason I said over 100,000 is due to the widespread persecution of scientists who have dissented from Darwinism documented the movie documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Involved and other sources.

      See:

      http://creation.com/expelled-new-movie-exposes-persecution-of-anti-darwinists

      http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=q8c3e6jgbeg294f9fvk6e0lc05


      Also, there have been cases where the scientific consensus was wrong and the Bible was correct. See:
      http://ed5015.tripod.com/BLions87.htm and http://ed5015.tripod.com/BWilliamsvsAnon71to73.htm

      Delete
  3. Please tell me, PLEASE, that you are being sarcastic and don't actually believe all that BS up there. If so, I think I've just lost all faith in humanity! This is why we're 25th in education, because we argue about stuff like this. Truth is not a democracy, whether 9% or 99% of people believe in evolution is irrelevant. What kind of crazy world do you want us living in where reality is by majority vote?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jonathon,

      A few points:

      1. Who largely controls the education establishment in the USA? Is it liberal evolutionists? There you go! Private Christian fundamentalist religious school students and Christian homeschoolers outperform public school students on scholastic tests. Checkmate evolutionist!

      2. You are practicing the fallacy of exclusion. I provided the resource Refuting evolution which thoroughly debunks evolutionism. Please try to be more logical in the future.

      3. Are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.

      If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: http://login.meetcheap.com/conference,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod

      If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua

      There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer and carry through with the debate.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.