Monday, December 26, 2011

Making 2012 the worst year in the history of Darwinism

The new year is rapidly approaching. Accordingly, it is time for our Question evolution! campaign to chart out our group's vision for 2012. Simply put, we want to help make 2012 the worst year in the history of Darwinism. More specifically, in the Western World we want to help make 2012 a pivotal year as far as the expansion of creation evangelism. Our goal is to help our fellow creationists increase the percentage of the Western World population which holds to a biblical creation worldview which should aid Christian evangelism.

That's a pretty big goal isn't it? The Christian writer and mountain climber John Noe wrote: "High achievers make no small plans". If our Question evolution! campaign group wants to go from summit to summit of achievement in the creation vs. evolution arena, we are certainly not going to do it though the setting of small goals. The setting of small goals may be satisfying to an evolutionist and an atheist, but certainly Christians have a higher calling. Feeble goal setting is fitting for passive and apathetic evolutionists, but not for Bible believing Christians. In 2012, our group desires to soar like eagles and make evolutionary dogma our prey.

Our first order of business in 2012

God willing, some of the things our group want to accomplish in 2012 are:

1. There are over 170 creationist groups for us to contact in the countries Creation Ministries International (CMI) has offices in (United States, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Singapore). In addition, we want to contact prominent creationists in India (According to the web traffic company Alexa, CMI has 3.5% of its web traffic coming from India). These organizations are excellent candidates for the Question evolution campaign. 

2. Spread the campaign into churches and schools. There are already Christian Bible groups and Christian groups in schools. These school groups are prime candidates for the campaign.

3. Spread the campaign on the internet through Christian blogs, Christian websites, Christian news organizations and other websites friendly to our cause.

4. Use other popular websites to spread the campaign such as YouTube, Twitter, etc.

5. Create educational materials for young people and others based on the 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer

6. Continue the process of growing our Question evolution! campaign volunteer group (for the results of one of our most recent volunteer recruitment drives see: Our growing Question evolution! campaign group).

For additional information see:

Our Question Evolution! group's plans for 2012

Related resources:

Question evolution! campaign

15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer

Creation evangelism and the Question evolution! campaign



  1. evolution is indeed a horrid hoax and delusion - hooray for the truth!! - onward to 2012!

  2. This website seems to be more about cheerleading than facts. And that's fine, but my bafflement about the "15 Questions" is that most of them have nothing to do with the Theory of Evolution. They also misuse a lot of terminology. But....God bless you.

    1. Bible and science,

      You made a number of accusations/claims, none of which you backed up. Are you an evolutionists?

      If you are an evolutionist, are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists (see: )
      via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.

      If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room:,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at

      If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua

      There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer and carry through with the debate.

  3. You lost my respect with your childish threat of the equivalent of "I will now cross my arms and hold my breath and won't talk to you any more----unless you do EXACTLY what I command." Very mature.

    Clearly you don't want to address the fact that most of the 15 questions have nothing to do with evolution theory. Message received. As for your threat, censorship is never far behind, is it? (Total control over the discourse is your tactic, is it?)

    Professor Tertius is willing to debate the single spokesman of your choice in print/electronic-format. (Oral debates are about cheap rhetoric and playing to audiences, not evidence. All too often they sink to a fifth-grade level. They also do a poor job of exposing lies, dishonest quote-mining, and lack of primary sources. Print/electronic keeps everything out in the open and honest) The Bible.and.Science.Forum reserves the right to distribute all rounds of the debate to their subscribers as each round is posted. Each round restricted to 15,000 words per side at 10 day intervals. Copyrights must be shared by both parties with mutual permissions for all unilateral uses, royalty-free. Please provide an email address for making the arrangements.

    Clearly my post struck a nerve. So be it. This should be fun!

    P.S. There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer BY POSTING THIS PRESENT ENTIRE EXCHANGE ON THIS BLOG and agree to carry through with the debate. If I don't see this posting on the blog I will know that you chickened out.

    1. Bible and science forum,

      A few points:

      1. There are too many insincere evolutionist posers who lack confidence in it. It is just window dressing for rebellion to biblical authority. The debate challenge weeds out the time wasters like yourself. See:

      2. Your respect and couple of dollars will give me a cup of coffee.

      3. re: supposedly striking a nerve. Your "internet psychologist" analysis is quite unimpressive.

      4. Oral debate excusitus

      We can even have it be a series of debates like the Lincoln-Douglass debates so each side has PLENTY of time to respond. So you have no excuses. Each side could widely distubute the debate(s) via YouTube and other video sharing websites.

      Stop making excuses! Man up and let's move forward. Unless of course, you are afraid of losing a debate! We all know you that are afraid - very afraid! Creationists tend to win the debates and we both know this:

      Get out of your intellectual bunny hole and let's move forward.

  4. Humble Doulos of Jesus Christ,

    We offered an oral debate with a web large audience or a series of debates with a large web audience so each side's position could be fully aired.
    He declined. Until he accepts our debate offer, we are not going to entertain any alternative offers. It is that simple. Feel free to bellyache about this, but it will come to naught.

    If he is too afraid to accept our debate offer, he is going to have to accept the consequences.

  5. Why are you afraid of facing Professor Tertius in a written, published debate?

    (Your "bellyaching" is duly noted. You are afraid of the format where people can easily check your honesty in print.)

    Now I understand your side of the story. Very well.

  6. Jesus is Kurios,

    I am going to lay my cards on the table now.

    I suspect this Bible and Science Forum debate challenge is wild goose chase. I could not find a Bible and Science forum on the web. I have a suspicion some atheists are trying to waste my time.

    Second, who is Professor Tertius?

    Third, people can easily fact check recorded oral debates. At least people with some basic library skills. Given that so many atheists and/or evolutionists attend poorly run public school, perhaps fact checking oral debates is beyond your current skill set!


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.