Resolving the creation vs. evolution war: Independent third party arbitration or total victory and systematically grinding away at the folly of Darwinism?

Recently, someone commented on the Question Evolution! Campaign and its 15 questions for evolutionists. He politely suggested that some independent third party arbiter judge whether evolutionists have satisfactorily answered the 15 questions for evolutionists. He was unable to propose who the arbitrator would be, however.

Arbitration and the 15 questions for evolutionists

A few points: 

1. There is no doubt the 15 questions for evolutionists are relevant and deserve to be asked. A moderator at Richard Dawkins' website said the questions were interesting questions when he posted them to the Richard Dawkins website. And even though Dawkins' reach to the general public is a shadow of its former self, he still is considered to be a leading spokesman for Darwinism.  See:  2012 was a very BAD year for the evolutionist Richard Dawkins

2. Judging by the feeble debate performance of a Reddit atheist to the 15 questions for evolutionists, the embarrassing tackling of the 15 questions by another evolutionist  (MOPC) and  the fear of the larger evolutionist community to debate these 15 questions with the popular YouTube Christian Shockofgod and his chat room moderator who has taken biology courses at a major university, these 15 fundamental questions posed to evolutionists are totally stumping evolutionists and thoroughly making an embarrassment of the bankrupt ideology Darwinism (see the videos below). 

Abitration or total victory and systematically grinding away at Darwinism at a high rate of speed

Given the two points above,  the only thing left to do is to widely disseminate the Question Evolution! Campaign and let the 15 questions for evolutionists grind away at the folly of evolutionism.  And we believe we have a plan in place that will be an absolute machine when in comes grinding away at Darwinism.

God's grace and the patience of saints and planning can work wonders

One of the things many atheists, agnostics. Darwinists typically lack is patience and planning. That is why atheists and evolutionists have no master plan to stop their global decline and the explosive growth in global creationism even in secular countries such as France.   See:  Evolutionists, atheists and agnostics: What is your master plan to reverse your decline?

Christian creationists are not like this.  We have the patience of saints because we are saints. We can plan our work and patiently work our plan.  We can make continued daily, weekly and yearly success until our objectives are achieved. And there is absolutely every reason to believe the plans of creationists will see big success given the many powerful trends that are in favor of biblical creation belief having long term success and atheism, agnosticism and Darwinism having a bleak future.

Timing, patience and aggressive outreach will inevitably lead to many victories in 2013 and beyond

Furthermore, in addition to having patience, Christians historically are very aggressive when it comes to evangelism in order to capitalize on the opportunities God provides us. The proliferation of Christianity across the globe and its current global expansion  is testimony to this fact. See: Rise of global Christianity

King Solomon taught that there is a time for everything under the sun.  The great military strategist Sun Tzu taught the importance of timing and flexibility. And now the time is ripe for the campaign to rapidly increase its outreach.

Evolutionists, we predicted that 2012 would be the worst year in the history of Darwinism and it was so. Expect 2013 to be the worst year in the history of Darwinism.

2012 was a BAD year for Darwinism and atheism

 2012 was a very BAD year for the evolutionist Richard Dawkins

Was 2012 a BAD year for Reddit atheism?

 

2012 has been a very BAD year for Darwinism ...

Scienceblogs.com failed in 2012

Decline of internet atheism 

 

Wikipedia was a mess in 2012

 

2012 is shaping up to be a BAD year for atheism and evolutionism!

2013 will be the worst year in the history of Darwinism

Making 2013 be the WORST year in the history of Darwinism.

Making 2013 be the WORST year in the history of Darwinism. - Part 2

Related posts
 
Our group's plan, strategy and tactics for advancing the Question Evolution! Campaign

A systematic approach to attacking Darwinism

5 strategies to collapse Darwinism

15 questions evolutionists hate: Live dialogue - Shockofgod



MOPC vs. Shockofgod debate exchange



15 Questions Evolutionists STILL can't answer!




Question Evolution! Campaign resources and other resources

Question Evolution! Campaign

15 questions for evolutionists

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15

Creation Ministries International Question Evolution! Videos:

• Question Evolution! campaign - Introduction

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists -- General objections

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists -- Question 1

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists -- Question 2

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 3

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 4

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 5

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 6

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 7

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 8

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 9

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 10

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 11

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 12

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 13

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 14

• 15 Questions for Evolutionists - Question 15

Picture credits

Meat grinder
source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GW300_1.jpg
Title: Frozen meat grinder GW 300.

Author: User:Seydelmann

License: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

An evolutionist tries to grab the moral ground, but he is quickly driven down the creation vs. evolution mountain. In addition, the 15 questions for evolutionists debate gauntlet was thrown down again!

Once again, biblical creationists retain the moral high ground and another evolutionists suffers a humbling defeat trying to ascend this well defended position.  If only the evolutionists could answer the 15 questions for evolutionists and rebut the abundant evidence for biblical creation.

Specifically, on November 26, 2012, we published an article entitled An evolutionist whines about the inevitable total victory of creationists over Darwinism which is coming

An evolutionist who goes by the name Cason White wrote in response to that article:

i feel like you are being too hard on all of these people.... treating evolutionists like scum is not a good way to convert them. And it definitely does not help that you throw down the gauntlet and prevent them from replying until they do an oral debate... i mean, come on, really? maybe you should actually be polite and less people would post on here with angry thoughts... just some advice...

 Of course, as can be seen below, his attempt to grab the moral ground was not only quickly repulsed, but the 15 questions for evolutionists debate gauntlet was thrown down again by our Question Evolution! Campaign group. If Cason White is an evolutionists, I would point out that our debate gauntlet has yet to picked up by Mr. White.  And we know why, he would terribly lose such a debate!

Also, notice he says "feel" above without showing his complaint has merit. Of course, this is not surprising since belief in evolution boils down to a "gut feeling".  Evolutionism certainly  does not rest on sound evidence. 

Our response to Cason White

Behold, our response Cason White:

Cason White,

A few points:

1. Given the heavy handed tactics of evolutionists and the power of the state that evolutionist use to indoctrinate public school children, evolutionists are hardly on the moral high ground. See: Slaughter of the Dissidents  and New Movie Exposes the persecution of anti-Darwnists and Evolutionists are indoctination children

In addition, there is the issue of evolutionary racism and violence. See: Evolutionary belief and communism/Nazism

So evolutionists are more likely to treat people like scum. There are plenty of Christian charities, but no Darwinist charities that I am aware of. In fact, social Darwinism belittled charitableness. See: Herbert Spencer: The Father of Social Darwinism

2. You didn't demonstrate your allegation that all evolutionists are treated like scum at this blog rather than treated differently depending on their comments. Please refrain from making unsupported allegations.

3. We know that evolutionism is not ground on sound evidence, but rather on indoctrination, "gut feelings" and very often insincere bluffing and that is why leading evolutionists no longer widely debate (before they lost debate after debate). See: Belief in evolution boils down to a "gut feeling" and Creation scientists tend to win the debates

4. Evolutionism is contrary to the available evidence. See: Creation vs. evolution answers

5. Are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists (see: 15 questions for evolutionists )
via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.

If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: Shockofgod's free chat room You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at Shockofgod's YouTube account

If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua

Question Evolution! Campaign resources and other resources:

Question Evolution! Campaign

15 questions for evolutionists

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15

Refuting evolution

Evidence for Christianity

15 Questions Evolutionists STILL can't answer!

Darwinism lost its bite after the 15 questions for evolutionists cone of shame was placed on its head

As you can see, Darwinism lost its bite after the 15 questions for evolutionists cone of shame was placed on its head.  Evolutionist STILL cannot effectively answer the 15 questions for evolutionists!

And now its time to neuter Darwinism via the widespread dissemination phase of the Question Evolution! Campaign. and via the other efforts of creationists. The web traffic for atheist and evolutionist websites is going to continue to fall.  See: Decline of internet atheism and evolutionism and  Rise of global Christianity and creationism and the decline of global atheism and agnosticism 

Other Related articles 
 
Our Question Evolution! group's plans
 
Making 2012 be the WORST year in the history of Darwinism

Making 2013 be the WORST year in the history of Darwinism.

 Question Evolution! Campaign Resources

Question Evolution! Campaign

15 questions for evolutionists

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15

Refuting evolution

Evidence for Christianity

Additional Evidence for Christianity


15 questions evolutionist STILL cannot answer!



Photo credits:

1. Dog with cone collar

Title: KICX0462.JPG

Photographer/Flickr username:  pwever

Source:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/pwever/101978679/

License: Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0), see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en

The Scientific Method and Answer to Reader Response from Ike SDSU, 5/17/2012

Reader Response:

Here is a comment, left in its uncensored form, from one of our apparently evolutionist readers self-identified as IkeSDSU from 5/17/2012.

Ha ha ha, you creationists, just keep on burying your head in the sand. If you can't see it, it isn't true right? People that are real scientists don't believe your crap and you campain is just waste of time. It will never be taken seriously since you will never let it be analysed using the scientific method. "Because it says so in this book" doesn't hold up. Just stay ignorant, you are only hurting yourself as the world passes you by. 

Here is an answer:

So, Ike, have you used the scientific method to confirm or disconfirm either the Bible or the textbooks proclaiming evolution?  Do you believe evolution because “it says so in your text books” or have you performed actual experiments? Somewhat hypocritical, don’t you think? Particularly when evolutionist scientists consistently have to admit they are wrong and that evolution just does not have the evidence to back it up step-by-step.

Ike, let’s look at the scientific method and evolution.  This is what the majority of the 15 Questions for Evolutionists are about. To follow the scientific method you observe something, form a hypothesis, and perform experiments attempting to prove or disprove your hypothesis (confirm or disconfirm).  Once you achieve consistent results you either reject your hypothesis as disproven or you refine it to the conditions of the experiment confirming it.  From here more experiments are done to confirm your refined hypothesis in order to disprove it, or confirm and possibly further refine it.  Once this point is achieved, others also conduct experiments and if the results consistently confirm your hypothesis, it may be advanced to become a scientific theory; at which point it continues to be critically tested by others and either becomes accepted or rejected.

We’ll look at one simple example.  Is it scientifically established that any creature of any kind has ever been witnessed to reproduce a creature of another kind as required in the General Theory of Evolution? Has it ever been observed in nature?  Has it ever been observed in a laboratory?

The scientifically observed and tested answer to this question is, ‘”No, no living creature has ever been witnessed to reproduce a different kind of creature as required by the General Theory of Evolution.”

Due to this scientific observation that living creatures are always, one hundred percent of the time, reproduced by another living creature of the same kind, the General Theory of Evolution (often referred to as goo-to-you, pond scum-to-plumber, microbes-to-microbiologist, etc.) is dead in the water.  The number one requirement for the General Theory of Evolution to be true has already been scientifically disproven by the scientific method.

By the way, there are the statements in a certain historical text that have been scientifically confirmed as accurate:

“And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind:...”

“..great whales, and every living creature that moves, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind:...”

“...bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.”

“...made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creeps on the earth after his kind: ...”

Ike, please show me your evidence confirmed by the scientific method where any of these statements of fact have been scientifically disconfirmed.  Have any of these creatures been scientifically shown and confirmed to have brought forth any offspring that were not of their own kind? No, they have not.  They have always been proven to bring forth offspring only after their own kind.

We have a text that in its original autograph is over 3,000 years old that is wholly consistent with testing and observation by the scientific method.  This is opposed to your belief in the General Theory of Evolution which is here disproven by the same scientific method you claim we ignore.

So, Ike, who is playing ‘ostrich’ and burying their head in the sand?

By the way, Ike, would you like to actually attempt to answer one of the 15 Questions for Evolutionists?

Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?

Question 15:

Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Karl Popper, famous philosopher of science, said “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical [religious] research programme ....”[13] Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”[14] If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught?, creation.com/notscience (Sourced from 15 Questions for Evolutionists)

[13] Popper, K., Unended Quest, Fontana, Collins, Glasgow, p. 151, 1976.

[14] Ruse, M., How evolution became a religion: creationists correct? National Post, pp. B1,B3,B7 May 13, 2000.

So, the famous Karl Popper admitted that “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme.”  A “metaphysical” program?

Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary Online tells us metaphysical means “of or relating to the transcendent or to a reality beyond what is perceptible to the senses, supernatural.”

Evolutionists claim Biblical Creation cannot be taught in schools, regardless of whether or not it is true, because it does not rely on science, but upon the supernatural.  How is it a leading evolutionist of his time could admit evolution is NOT a testable scientific theory, thus making evolution NOT science, but is instead a metaphysical (reality beyond what is perceptible to the senses, supernatural) program and evolutionists still claim evolution is science, and do so with a straight face and actually expect anyone to believe them?

How is it this admitted metaphysical theory about history, a religious idea and dogmatic belief system, is taught as science in science classes?

Eminent philosopher of science, Michael Ruse spelled this out even more clearly when he said, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”

If religion is not allowed to be taught in public schools, and not allowed to be taught in science classes, then why is the religion of evolution (in evolutionist Michael Ruse’s own words) being taught in our science classes?  Scientifically inquiring minds want to know.

Related Articles:

Responses to our 15 Questions: part 3 - Questions 9–15

15 Questions for Evolutionists

How Religiously Neutral are the Anti-Creationist Organisations?