How did life with specifications for hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
“Evolutionist Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.” Andrew Knoll, professor of biology, Harvard, said, “we don’t really know how life originated on this planet”. A minimal cell needs several hundred proteins. Even if every atom in the universe were an experiment with all the correct amino acids present for every possible molecular vibration in the supposed evolutionary age of the universe, not even one average-sized functional protein would form. So how did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?”
Our public schools at all levels are teaching our children that evolution is science. It is a known scientific fact that life only comes from life, yet, evolutionists claim abiogenesis occurred at least one time. No scientist, evolutionist or not, has ever witnessed abiogenesis. The two evolutionist scientists cited above make their own admissions of the total lack of knowledge about how life came to be, according to evolutionists.
Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.”
If “nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell”, then how can evolutionists claim it was by abiogenesis? This admission tells us that nobody knows, therefore, claiming abiogenesis even though “nobody knows” is unscientific.
Professor Andrew Knoll, when asked, “In a nutshell, what is the process? How does life form?” answered, “The short answer is we don't really know how life originated on this planet.”
Then, Professor Knoll attempts to obfuscate his admission.
If leading evolutionist scientists do not know how life originated on this planet, then why does the NCSE (National Council for Science Education) insist teaching life evolved from non-living chemicals is science?
Evolutionists, please, show me where any non-living chemicals are evolving into a living cell. Please, show me any experiment where non-living chemicals are put together and become an actual living cell. Even easier, just show me how all the proteins necessary came together, from non-living chemicals, without interference from an intelligent being (scientist or other such person) in or out of a lab.
If you cannot, then stop claiming non-living chemicals evolved into a living cell, then eventually evolved into the life we see around us today. Moreover, stop trying to force everyone else to accept it as fact.
Since we always, without exception witness life coming from already existing life, where did the first life come from? We have eyewitness testimony, but His Word is not permissible, according to the evolutionists.
1. Davies, Paul, Australian Centre for Astrobiology, Sydney, New Scientist 179(2403):32, 2003.; http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17924034.700-was-life-on-earth-born-lucky.html
2. Knoll, Andrew H., PBS Nova interview, How Did Life Begin? July 1, 2004. See answer to fifth question in the interview transcript. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/evolution/how-did-life-begin.html
3. 15 QUESTIONS FOR EVOLUTIONISTS, Tract