Another part of the natural world that Richard Dawkins fails to understand

The website of Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science declares:

The mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering.

Well, it seems as if the internet is another part of the natural world that Richard Dawkins does not understand as this website is suffering a lack of web traffic as Compete.com shows a mere 693 visitors a month for the month of 9/2012. And Alexa ranks it merely among the top 2,412,080 websites in the world. This Question Evolution! blog ranks among the top 1,147,278 websites of the world.  

If only Richard Dawkins understood the internet and computer science as well as the humble Christian members of this blog then perhaps he could vanquish this creationist blog! And if Richard Dawkins understood the social sciences better maybe he could understand human behavior better and this might help too. This is another case of an evolutionists having a hard time understanding the sciences! Come on Richard! It is time for you to put on your critical thinking cap and defeat religious fundamentalism once and for all!
 
Web traffic of  Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science according to Compete.com

In addition, the main website of Richarddawkins has lost a significant amount of web traffic as can be seen by the web traffic tracking company Quantcast which directly measures the web traffic of this domain (click graph below for details):

Another humbling defeat for Richard Dawkins on the internet, computer science and social sciences front! 

On the other hand, Creation Ministries International has a firmer grasp on the internet which is a part of the natural world as can be seen below (click graph for details): 

In addition, the atheists/agnostics are losing on the superstition front as well. 

In September of 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported:

The reality is that the New Atheist campaign, by discouraging religion, won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.

"What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that traditional Christian religion greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of astrology. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians...

This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book "The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener," skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in pseudoscience, cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.

Other 

USA Question Evolution! Campaign outreach a success. Quantcast shows Creation.com having 453% more web traffic than Richard Dawkins's website  
 

Question evolution! campaign resources

Question Evolution! Campaign

15 questions for evolutionists

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15

Refuting evolution

15 Questions Evolutionists STILL can't answer!