(For those who are familiar with creation vs. evolution issue, the January 20, 2012 Live Science article reporting that Belief in Evolution Boils Down to a Gut Feeling came as no surprise)
Also, please ask yourselves these questions:
1. What is the primary underlying reason why so many evolutionists push evolutionary belief?
The businessman J.P. Morgan declared: "A man generally has two reasons for doing a thing. One that sounds good, and a real one."
Atheist evolutionists certainly have no cause to push evolutionism since creation testifies to the existence of God. (Romans 1:20).
2. Why are the next 8 years so important in the creation vs. evolution battle? What is at stake for America, Canada and the world.
3. Do you want to effectively combat the evolutionary plague?
A closer look at fanatical Darwinism
There are a lot of misguided beliefs in the world. For example, there still plenty of people who believe in the astrology bunk, but you don't see Darwinist typically doing astrology protests or commonly making great efforts to get astrology sections out of their local newspapers, do you? There is definitely something inconsistent and amiss. The are also people who still believe the world is flat and the moon landings were merely hoax. But you don't see Darwinists engaging in Flat Earth Society protests or putting in a lot of effort to combat moon landing deniers, do you?
On the other hand, we now know that the tonsils and other supposed useful organs in the body serve a purpose and thanks to evolutionism many people had their tonsils needlessly ripped out. The truth is that no scientific breakthroughs which have greatly benefited mankind have occurred due to Darwinism and that Darwinism has hindered science.
Interesting study: Morals decline linked to belief in evolution
A research survey of 1535 people, conducted by the Australian National University, revealed that belief in evolution is associated with moral permissiveness.
For more information see:
Morals decline linked to belief in evolution
Why do many fanatical evolutionists religiously promote Darwinism?
The Bible declares:
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God. - I Corinthians 6: 9-11
Likewise the Bible declares:
Now the deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality,
idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, outbursts of anger, disputes, dissensions, factions, envying, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these, of which I forewarn you, just as I have forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. - Galations 5: 19-21
The Apostle Paul wrote to the Roman church:
For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in [t]their own persons the due penalty of their error. - Romans 1:26-27Plus, you can add sins like sloth and gluttony and a myriad of other sins which men commit. For example, sins of omission can be counted too.
Acceptance of biblical authority via things like the acceptance of biblical creation means men are accountable to God and in need of repentance and that is something the great bulk of mankind is unwilling to do. Wide is the gate to destruction Jesus taught and narrow is the way to life. In short, the required humility, moral purity, accountability and love for thy neighbor required of Christian creationists is very distasteful to the dogmatic Darwinist. Hence, Darwinists have concocted things like Social Darwinism and the master race of the Nazis which resulted in millions of deaths through racial genocide.
In the last 60 years, the most ardent promoters of evolutionary belief have been atheists and their ideological cousins agnostics. On the internet the hatefulness, combativeness and dysfunction of atheists is infamous. For example, in 2010 the The Telegraph ran a story titled Richard Dawkins in bitter web censorship row with fellow atheists with the byline "Professor Richard Dawkins is embroiled in a bitter online battle over plans to rid his popular internet forum for atheists of foul language, insults and 'frivolous gossip'." Recently, YouTube's most subscribed to atheist, TheAmazingAtheist, told a rape victim that "she deserved it" and that her rapist "deserved a medal". Atheism does not exactly have a positive image on the internet, does it? Want to know why so many evolutionists are so argumentative and hateful? Now you know why.
Change is possible for dogmatic evolutionists/atheists: How to become a Christian
Good news - The gospel of Jesus Christ
Why are the next 8 years so important in the creation vs. evolution battle? What is at stake for America, Canada and the world?
Would you like to hear some fantastic news - especially for creationists? Don't watch the television news because you won't hear it discussed by the liberal media.
Please read our posts:
Why our Question Evolution! group is focusing on America and Canada
Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?
Related resources:
They are teaching lies to our kids
Abortion and feminism: ‘lies destroying the family’
Handling the barrage of homosexual half-truths
Question Evolution! Campaign
15 questions for evolutionists
Scientific American admits creationists hit a sore spot
Refuting evolution
Atheism
Darwin's deadly legacy
" For example, there still plenty of people who believe in the astrology bunk, but you don't see Darwinist typically doing astrology protests or commonly making great efforts to get astrology sections out of their local newspapers, do you?"
ReplyDeleteAre astrologers attempting to get "equal time" for both astrology and astronomy in public schools?
Phil,
DeleteYou may or may not know dogmatic evolutionists push evolutionism.
But I do and cite this from the article:
"In the last 60 years, the most ardent promoters of evolutionary belief have been atheists and their ideological cousins agnostics."
By the way, I hope you don't think your wrangling will stop this: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-all-out-assault-on-evolutionary.html Because it won't.
Have a nice day! :)
"Global atheism is going to continue to shrink and the public's interest in evolutionism is going to continue to decline as well. Expect these trends to accelerate. Nothing you do will likely stop these trends."
ReplyDeleteIf you are basing these trends on "evidence" the same people who "prove" evolution doesn't exist gathered, I don't think anyone feels threatened! I would contemplate suicide if you ran the world.
This empty comment of yours devoid of any buttressing facts to support your contention is symptomatic of someone who dogmatically holds to a bankrupt ideology.
DeleteIf you do not step up your game, I see no reason to post your future comments.
It is typical for a creationist to find fault with the others without first pointing to his own mistakes. Hitler is not evalutions theory. We are all part of evalutions theory. Your evidence is shameful images. A proof of own theory is not to denounce or disprove evalutionsteorien.
ReplyDeleteBrian,
DeleteA few points:
1. You wrote:
"It is typical for a creationist to find fault with the others without first pointing to his own mistakes."
Please support this contention with adequate proof and evidence. For example, a study on this matter.
2. You also wrote:
"We are all part of evalutions theory"
Please satisfactorily answer the 15 questions for evolutionists
3. You also wrote:
"Hitler is not evalutions theory."
Where was this claimed?
Also, just to make sure you are not an atheist or evolutionist denialist, please answer these questions:
Was Adolf Hitler a staunch evolutionist?
Was the Nazi plan to have a "master German race" an example of evolutionary racism? If not, why not?
Why did the staunch evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould write this:
"[Ernst] Haeckel was the chief apostle of evolution in Germany.... His evolutionary racism; his call to the German people for racial purity and unflinching devotion to a "just" state; his belief that harsh, inexorable laws of evolution ruled human civilization and nature alike, conferring upon favored races the right to dominate others; the irrational mysticism that had always stood in strange communion with his brave words about objective science - all contributed to the rise of Nazism." - Stephen J. Gould, "Ontogeny and Phylogeny," Belknap Press: Cambridge MA, 1977, pp.77-78).
4. You wrote:
"Your evidence is shameful images"
Please convincingly show the images were shameful. For each image, please show why it is shameful since you claimed multiple images were shameful.
Also, just to make sure you are not an atheist/evolutionist denialist, was the leading atheist/evolutionist Christopher Hitchens a drunkard?
Also, are you employing the fallacy of exclusion? For example, why was the Australian National University study cited not not relevant/valid evidence?
5. You wrote:
"A proof of own theory is not to denounce or disprove evalutionsteorien."
Is falsification and asking relevant questions about a scientific paradigm a valid part of scientific investigation? If not, why not?
If macroevolution is falsified or has not already been falsified, then why is this at not at all relevant to creation science?
It is a lie that scientists promote evolution because of religious agendas. In a recent pew survey, only 17% of scientists self-identify as atheist. My brother, a practicing geologist, does not personally know a scientist that identifies as an atheist. The reason scientists use evolution is simple: it works! Just as a carpenter uses a hammer to drive nails and not an egg, scientists use evolution rather than creationism because it would be difficult if not impossible for them to do science without it. Complaining about evolution because it is Godless makes as much sense as complaining about algebra because it is Godless.
ReplyDeleteFred,
Delete1. Your claims are not going to be taken at face value. You need to cite your sources. For example, your Pew Forum claim.
2. You didn't support your claim related to religious agenda adequately. For example, the article specifically says the most ardent promoters of evolution have been atheists/agnostics and cites relevant data. Notice the word "ardent". You also have to address the issue of liberal Christianity which often attempts to dispute and downplay the supernatural in the world and in history.
3. When push comes to shove, evolutionists have repeatedly shown they are unwilling to defend evolutionism publicly and they lost hundreds of debates at universities etc before crawling into their intellectual bunnyholes: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/09/evc-forum-and-fairness-of-evolutionists.html
Are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists (see: http://creation.com/15-questions )
via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.
If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: http://login.meetcheap.com/conference,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod
If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua
I'm not here to debate. If you want to research the pew figures, do a google search yourself.
DeleteFred Kohn,
DeleteI realize that evolutionists/atheists/agnostics are really into rebellion and being oppositional.
However, we gave you our terms of debate and we are giving you an opportunity to air your errant evolutionist views to tens of thousands of people in a debate. If you were truly confident in your views, one would think you would jump at this opportunity.
Here are our terms again along with easy to do instructions:
Are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists (see: http://creation.com/15-questions )
via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.
If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: http://login.meetcheap.com/conference,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod
If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua
There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer and carry through with the debate.