Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? Darwin noted the problem and it still remains. The evolutionary family trees in textbooks are based on imag-ination, not fossil evidence. Famous Harvard paleontologist (and evolutionist), Stephen Jay Gould, wrote, “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology”.6 Other evolutionist fossil experts also acknowledge the problem. creation.com/pattquote (sourced from the 15 Questions for Evolutionists Tract)
With millions of different species of animals there should be billions, if not trillions, of transitional fossils, yet there is not one indisputable transitional fossil. Where did all these fossils go? Artistic renderings of what scientists believe or imagine happened are not scientific evidence.
Many evolutionists and evolutionist scientists overlook this important lack of evidence as inconsequential because they “know” evolution is a ”scientific fact”, even though the scientific evidence they need to prove it is entirely missing.
So, evolutionists, “Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing?”
Surely you didn’t accidentally misplace them.
6 Gould, Stephen Jay, Evolution’s erratic pace, Natural History 86(5):14, May 1977.
Related Articles:The links are missing