3 reasons why seeing proud and incompetent atheist and agnostic fools epically fail is quite entertaining!

So what are the 3 reasons it is entertaining to see proud and incompetent atheist and agnostic fools epically fail? 

1. God and his people can and do laugh at stubborn fools!

First, seeing proud, but cowardly and incompetent atheist and agnostic fools fail is very entertaining. Although God would prefer that people repent, God does enjoy laughing at proud and stubborn people and the Scripture declares: "He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord holds them in derision." (Psalm 2:4). Also,  Elijah taunted the prophets of Baal.  No doubt this was not a laughing matter for these false prophets and a source of humiliation, but  Elijah was certainly amused as he taunted them.  

 If only the atheists at RationalWiki could rebut Dr. Don Batten's article on the origin of life (see: Origin of life) then creationist could take them seriously. An article which cites the prominent evolutionists PZ Myers and Nick Matzke declaring that evolution is part of the evolutionary paradigm. The atheists/evolutionists know that the origin of life is not only a vexing problem and unsolvable problem for evolutionists, but it also clearly shows that life was designed by a designer. In short, evolutionism fails from the gitgo. 

According to the fools at RationalWiki the first question of the Question Evolution! Campaign
dealing with the origin of life is a non-starter (see:  15 Questions for evolutionists ). The RationalWiki website still stubbornly declares: "This first question is actually entirely irrelevant - Evolution does not claim to explain the origin of life, nor has it ever attempted to do so."  Then why does a high priest of evolutionism, the atheist PZ Myers, declare that the origin of life is part of the evolutionary paradigm? 

Also, according to the pro-evolution website Wikipedia: "Nicholas J. Matzke is the former Public Information Project Director at the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) and served an instrumental role in NCSE's preparation for the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial."  So we have another high priest of evolution declaring  that the origin of life is part of the evolutionary paradigm.

Given the total failure of evolutionists when it comes to the origin of life, RationalWikians are still desperately  and unsuccessfully trying to decouple the origin of life from evolution, a tenet of their errant and foolish religion of atheism. But they cannot do it credibly given the statements of PZ Myers and Nick Matze. In addition, Richard Dawkins attempts to defend a naturalistic origin of life in his recent book The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. A book which focuses on attempting to defend evolutionism!

RationalWikians remind me of the Japanese soldiers on remote islands in WWII who keep on fighting even though Japan lost the war.  Their resistance to admitting their error and facing reality is not based on consistency and a careful deliberation of facts, but on their unadulterated foolish dispositions.   And what is even more pathetic is that other evolutionists committed the same error when criticizing the 15 questions for evolutionists.   Darwinists don't even know their own religion according to their high priests of evolution!  And even if they are informed of their error, they keep spouting the same nonsense regardless. This is truly sad.  What some people will do in order to continue their rebellion towards God - a God they know exists.

Questions: 

1.  Will the editors of RationalWikii admit their error?

2.  Why aren't followers of the evolution religion aware of major proclamations of their own high priests?

3. Will the editors of RationalWiki pick up the gauntlet thrown down to them and finally try to rebut this origin of life article? 

RationalWikians are not intellectually fulfilled atheists. They cannot scale the wall of the origin of life 

 Dr. Jonathon Sarfati wrote:

A huge barrier for those desiring to be ‘intellectually fulfilled atheists"  is finding a naturalistic origin of the first living organisms. Despite some evasion by major evolutionary propagandists, this is a part of the ‘General Theory of Evolution’, defined by the evolutionist Kerkut as ‘the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form.^"

2. Atheists often cannot debate effectively and  they cannot keep their sons and daughters in atheist fold

 Second,  I not only pointed out that RationalWikians are afraid of tackle Don Batten's origin of life, but I also showed that atheists, agnostics and evolutionists, often shrink back from debate and are rightly disparaged and mocked for it.

Furthermore, I demonstrated that only 30% of Americans raised by atheist parents retain their atheism which is the lowest of retention rates of all worldviews/religions studied in a Georgetown University study.  Even "magic underwear" expounding Mormons manage to keep more people in their fold!   Unlike Christianity whose apostles were willing to die for what they saw and heard, atheism never has and never will have a shred of proof and evidence that it is true.  Please see: 4 reasons why atheism and agnosticism are weak, errant, secular religions

Also, Professor Paul Vitz showed that most of the prominent atheists he studied using historical records had bad/non-existent relationships with their fathers (see: Psychology of atheism).  It certainly would not surprise me if many militant atheist fathers are arrogant, socially challenged individuals who have poor relationships with their sons.

3. How bleak is the future of atheism and agnosticism and how solid are the scholarly predictions about populations based on demographic data?

CNS News:

Atheism is in decline worldwide, with the number of atheists falling from 4.5% of the world’s population in 1970 to 2.0% in 2010 and projected to drop to 1.8% by 2020, according to a new report by the Center for the Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, Mass.

Read more at CNS News.

Next, citng the works of academics cited in academic journals relative to demographic projections, I showed the future of global atheism/agnosticm is very  bleak.    See: A number of academic journals now indicate that global atheism/agnosticism will keep shrinking in influence/adherents 

But how bleak is it for the hopes of militant atheists?

Consider this excerpt from the work of scholars Eric Kaufman (who is an agnostic), Vegard Skirbekk and Anne Goujon cited from ‘American political affiliation, 2003–43: A cohort component projection:

Unlike forecasts of, for example, long-term economic growth or energy use, demographic projections tend to have comparatively low error margins, even for projections made for half; a century ahead (National Research Council 2000; Keilman 2001).  Traits that systematically vary with age or cohort can thus be projected with a fair degree of accuracy (e.g.,K.C. et al. 2010)...Starting with the current age structures of the populations and incorporating alternative scenarios for migration and differential fertility allowed us to model and to do so more accurately than previously the social consequences of population change.

Bottom line:  The studies/articles I cited about the coming demographic implosion of the global atheist/agnostic populations and the rise of global religious conservatism, not only reflect long standing trends, but is based on demographic studies which have a history of a fair degree of accuracy in their predictions.  

While selfish atheists/agnostics continue to squabble and continue to have sub-replacement levels of children, loving Bible believing couples will continue to be fruitful and multiply!

Furthermore, consider these resources as well:  

Social unrest in Europe altering its religious landscape

The Eurozone crisis is not over. European socialism, atheism and Darwinism are in for a tough slog 

Why a literal reading of Genesis is surging in the world

Add 20 years of potential severe economic hardship to the many nails which are being pounded into the coffins of atheism and Darwinism.

No tears for an imploding atheism  

When you consider the history of atheism in terms of its lies, twisted morality, and murderous rampages,  Christians are not going to shed a single tear for the demise of influence of atheists in the world. Atheists have a legacy of being the biggest mass murders in history and have a legacy of suppressing intellectual freedom.  See:   Atheism and mass murder and Intolerant atheists

Evolution's Achilles' Heels


Evolution's Achilles' Heels

Other resources

Question Evolution! Campaign

15 Questions for evolutionists

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15

Refuting evolution