Showing posts with label atheism and liberalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label atheism and liberalism. Show all posts

Sunday, May 26, 2013

6 bellwethers showing liberal know it all-ism is unravelling. This will seriously affect Darwinism


Bellwether: "The term is derived from the Middle English bellewether and refers to the practice of placing a bell around the neck of a castrated ram (a wether) leading his flock of sheep. The movements of the flock could be noted by hearing the bell before the flock was in sight."

In 2005, CBS reported:
Americans most likely to believe in only evolution are liberals (36 percent), those who rarely or never attend religious services (25 percent), and those with a college degree or higher (24 percent).

White evangelicals (77 percent), weekly churchgoers (74 percent) and conservatives (64 percent), are mostly likely to say God created humans in their present form

What are the 6 bellwethers indicating that the religion of liberalism is failing and its liberal know it all prophets are being put to shame?  Will Christianity triumph over yet another religion? If these things are happening, how will this affect the liberal creation myth of evolution?

Recently, an Australian member of our Question Evolution! Campaign said that liberalism is a religion and compared them to the Pharisees who had power in Israel during the time of Jesus Christ.  Of course, we know that Christianity ultimately triumphed over the Pharisees.

6 bellwethers indicating that liberal know it all-ism is unravelling. This  will seriously undermine Darwinism

1. Barack Obama is facing three major scandals which is undermining the liberal party line of "liberal expertise".  See: Obama scandals and liberal expertise

2. Secular European socialism is economically unraveling. Liberal policies in America have given it a $16 trillion dollar Federal government debt. See: Economics and Darwinism/atheism

3. Lord Stern, who originally warned the UK Government about global warming/climate change, has admitted that global warming has been “fairly flat” for the last decade (See: Global warming alarmism).

It looks like the National Center for Science Education (NCSE)  two front Darwinism/global warming strategy is going to fail and they are stuck between a rock and hard place.  See: NCSE decides to fight a two front war

4. Sweden is having the birth pangs of its secular socialism unraveling via rioting of the Muslim population which is growing in Sweden while secularists in Sweden are not having a replacement level children. In 2011, Sweden had a fertility rate of 1.90 births per woman which is below the replacement level of births. In addition, a weak European economy is lowering the already low fertility rates of many countries in Europe. See: Stockholm riots continue and  European fertility rates

Bible believers and other religious conservatives will prevail in the world through secularist attrition, a much higher rate birth rate and Christian evangelism. See: and Global creationism is expanding

5. A New Zealand citizen involved in internet evangelism in a significant way recently received an email that indicated that internet evangelism could experience a quantum leap in its outreach capabilities. Christian internet evangelism already has significant momentum. Meanwhile, internet atheism and internet Darwinism is declining. In addition, global atheism/agnosticism is declining. See also:  New Zealand internet evangelist and  Decline of internet atheism articles and Christian evangelism vs. atheist evangelism

6.  Universities/colleges are seeing dropping enrollments and the college bubble has burst. See: College bubble burst

Evolutionists don't have the answers

The Question Evolution! Campaign has 15 questions for evolutionists.

Question 12 is:
“ Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? Evolutionists often use flexible story-telling to ‘explain’ observations contrary to evolutionary theory. NAS (USA) member Dr Philip Skell wrote, “Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.” ”
See also:
Atheists and agnostics don't have the answers - the miraculous does happen

Creation Ministries International declared:

Professor Richard Lewontin, a geneticist (and self-proclaimed Marxist), is certainly one of the world’s leaders in evolutionary biology. He wrote this very revealing comment (the italics were in the original). It illustrates the implicit philosophical bias against Genesis creation—regardless of whether or not the facts support it.
‘We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.
It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.
The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything. To appeal to an omnipotent deity is to allow that at any moment the regularities of nature may be ruptured, that Miracles may happen.
[but see the difference between origin and operational science—Ed.]’

Miracles do happen:
Evidence for Christianity: 

Evidence for Christianity 


It's all over evolutionists and atheists.  It time to pack up your Darwinist know it all marbles and go home.  The collapse of Darwinism is inevitable.

Stevie Wonder - He's Misstra Know-It-All



Question Evolution! Campaign resources and other resources:

Question Evolution! Campaign

15 questions for evolutionists

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8

Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15

Creation Ministries International Question Evolution! Videos
Photo credits:

1. Animal under rock picture

Title of picture: Between a rock and a hard place

Photographer: Gilles Gonthier

Location of photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gillesgonthier/412590265/

License agreement: Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0), see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en


2. Momentum graphic

Description: English: GoMomentum.com Logo

Date 1 June 2011

Source: HoodStacey, see: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Momentum-Solid-BLK.jpg

License: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

Saturday, October 27, 2012

5 reasons why the Atheism+ movement will fail














Another sect of atheism has arisen due to the horrible perception that atheists have in much of the world. It is called Atheism+.  The American atheists Sam Harris said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."

So how many facelifts does atheism need? What is next? The New, New, New Atheism? The new and improved atheism? Mint flavored atheism? You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

On August 23, 2012, Nelson Jones introduced the new sect of atheism called "Atheism+" via an article  in The New Statesman  entitled Atheism+: the new New Atheists. 

This new faction of atheism called Atheism+ was introduced thusly:
Let me introduce you to Atheism+, the nascent movement that might be the most exciting thing to hit the world of unbelief since Richard Dawkins teamed up with Christopher Hitchens to tell the world that God was a Delusion and, worse than that, Not Great.

Less than a week old in its current form, Atheism+ is the brainchild of Jen McCreight, a Seattle-based biology postgrad and blogger at the secularist Freethought network. She has called for a "new wave" of atheism on that "cares about how religion affects everyone and that applies skepticism to everything, including social issues like sexism, racism, politics, poverty, and crime."....

On one level, this is just the logical culmination of the huge upsurge in interest prompted by the so-called "New Atheists" and the growth over the last few years of a recognisable community or movement based around ideas of atheism, scientific scepticism and a progressive political agenda....

Atheism+ is, at its most basic, an attempt wrap things together more formally, to create a movement that prioritises issues of equality and does so from an explicitly non-religious perspective.
So how is Atheism+ working out according the leading website tracking companies? According to Compete.com the web traffic of Atheismplus.com from 8/20/2012 to 9/20/12 was 2,787 unique monthly visitors.

Web traffic of Atheismplus.com from 8/20/2012 to 9/20/12 according to Compete.com via a graphical reprentation:


Web traffic of Atheismplus.com according to Alexa is that it is among the top 267,612 websites in the world.

5 reasons why Atheism+ will be a long term failure

The Atheism+ movement has no long term sustainability over the long term for a number of significant reasons. It will be like many sects of atheism. It will be a new toy for atheists which is eventually put away in the closet and largely forgotten due to its unviability.

1. Atheists are tightfisted relative to Christians when it comes to charity

As noted above, one of the causes of Atheism+ is the cause of poverty.

A 2009 comprehensive study by Harvard University professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.

In 2007, the Barna Group reported
The typical no-faith American donated just $200 in 2006, which is more than seven times less than the amount contributed by the prototypical active-faith adult ($1500). Even when church-based giving is subtracted from the equation, active-faith adults donated twice as many dollars last year as did atheists and agnostics. In fact, while just 7% of active-faith adults failed to contribute any personal funds in 2006, that compares with 22% among the no-faith adults.

2. Greece and the Eurozone crisis is a bellweather of liberal economic policies and progressivism being unsustainable and failing

Atheism+ is adopting a liberal/progressive ideology at a time when these Western countries are saddled with tremendous amounts of government and external debt.  Although secular Europe has been able to kick the can of the Eurozone crisis down the road  and will likely continue to do so until at least the German elections in the fall of 2013, sooner or later they are going to have pay the piper and as Greece shows it will involve an enormous amount of financial pain. The United States government has racked up a tremendous amount of debt in the last 10 years or so as well 

Bottom line: As these debts continue to accrue, bondholders of these government debts are going to demand increase premiums due to increased risk so the debts will not be sustainable.In short, big spending progressive governments are going to run out of other people's money and there is going to be a lot of financial pain.

3. Feminism within will the Atheism+ sect of atheism will help insure it dies out long term due to sub-replacement birth rates within the movement plus it will be unappealing to many men

Sexism/chauvinism is a bad thing. I am guessing that many of the atheists in the Atheism+ movement, however, are also take things further and are feminists. Feminism is often very divisive plus it has some unintended consequences. Namely, it contributes to sub-replacement rates of fertility and atheists/agnostics already have sub replacement levels of fertility which is helping to fuel a global decline of atheism.

The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufmann using a multitude of demographic studies argues in an academic paper entitled Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth? Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century the decline of atheism in terms of its global adherents is an established trend that will persist for the foreseeable future and the rate of decline will accelerate and affect the Western World. A large part of this is due to atheists/agnostics having sub replacement levels of fertility. See: Why are the years 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?

Michael Blume, a researcher at the University of Jena in Germany, wrote "Most societies or communities that have espoused atheistic beliefs have not survived more than a century." Blume also indicated concerning concerning his research on this matter: "What I found was the complete lack of a single case of a secular population, community or movement that would just manage to retain replacement level."

In 2012,  CNN declared:
The phenomenon of women choosing not to have children is afflicting the industrialized world in alarming numbers. Childlessness is steadily becoming more widespread, particularly in English-speaking countries but also in Japan and in much of Europe. In 20 years, the number of childless women in many countries has doubled....

Although a minority of women choose not to have children, the trend constitutes a genuine revolution, pointing to some unspoken resistance to motherhood....No country can afford to ignore a decline in its birthrate. In the long term, a nation's pension payments, power and very survival are at stake...

Tellingly, these are the rallying causes of traditional feminism, more pressing and relevant than ever. It turns out that profound feminist reform, in the workplace and in family policies, might just be what is needed to keep the birthrate from free fall.Although the CNN article encourage governments to fund daycare and other measures to prevent birthrates from falling birthrates, I don't see this being very sustainable  at a time when many governments are already saddled with colossal amounts of debt.
4. Atheism as a whole is undergoing global decline so the movement will not be able to recruit atheists long term.

In 2012, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (GCTS) reported that every day there are 800 less atheists per day, 1,100 less non-religious (agnostic) people per day and 83,000 more people professing to be Christians per day (see: Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary - status of Global Mission report).

In 2012 an article entitled  Atheism in decline by Nigel Tomes declared:

The IBMR publishes yearly figures for religions (and non religions) around the globe. Their latest numbers, hot off the press (Jan. 2012) show some interesting trends.

1. Atheism is in Decline
In 1970 atheists (those avowing there is no God) numbered 166 million worldwide; that was almost one-in-twenty—4.5% of the globe’s population. By 2012 atheists’ number is estimated at 137 million. That’s a decline of almost 30 million. Since world population is growing, atheists’ share declined to less than one-in-fifty—under 2% in 2012. Put differently, every 24 hours there are 800 fewer atheists in the world! Atheism is in decline.
2. Agnosticism is in Decline
In 2000 agnostics (those who “don’t know” if there is a God) numbered 666 million, 10.9% of the world’s people. By 2012 agnostic’s number is estimated at 661 million--a decline of 5 million. In relative terms by 2012 agnostics represent less than one tenth (9.4%) of world population. Every 24 hours there are 1,100 less agnostics in the world. Agnostics are also in decline.
Added together these two groups make up a declining share of global population. In 1970 atheists and agnostics accounted for one-in-five (19.2%) of the world’s people. Based on current trends by 2025 they will represent less than one-in-ten (9.7%). Their population share will fall by half in 50+ years.

5. Global creationism is growing even in secular countries like France and developed countries like the United States. 

Evolutionists have no satisfactory answers to the 15 questions for evolutionists of the Question Evolution! Campaign

See also:

Global creationism is seeing explosive growth 

American young earth creationism increased in recent months - Gallup survey

French scholars say evangelicalism is likely the fastest growing religion in France

Evangelical Christianity rising in the UK and challenging the status quo 

European creationism is growing

The future of European Darwinism and atheism is bleak

Social unrest in Europe altering its religious landscape

Web traffic of the website of Creation Ministries International according to Quantcast (click graph below for details)





Decline of global atheism/agnosticism and the rise of global Christianity and global creationism 
 
Decline of global atheism/agnosticism and the rise of global Christianity/creationism


Decline of internet atheism and internet evolutionism


Global resurgence of religion and the failure of the seculization theory model 


Question Evolution! resources and other resources

 
Question Evolution! Campaign


15 questions for evolutionists


Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3


Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8


Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15


Refuting evolution


Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: Godless religions

Evidence for Christianity