Tuesday, April 23, 2013

The New York Times, a major pro-evolution newspaper, had a terrible 2012. 2013 will be an even worse year

The New York Times website is a very pro-evolution and pro-liberal ideology website that historically has had a significant ripple effect among other media outlets. As you can see via the web traffic graph above courtesy of Alexa, 2012 was a terrible year for the New York Times and we predict that 2013 will be even worse.

Why will the NY Times' readership likely grow worse and worse for the New York Times?

In April of 2013, BeyondChron, a San Francisco online daily, reported:

The State of the Media report said over 30 percent of respondents, a growing number, are fleeing their newspapers and magazines because of deteriorating quality.

Why is this important?

Consider what the investigative reporter John Stossel declared as reported by Cybercast News:

While the newspapers reach only a fraction of people compared to the television networks, he said radio and television producers rely heavily on their contents. "The reason the Times, and to a lesser extent the Post, are so important, and they are, is because the TV and radio - all of the media - copy it sycophantically," he [John Stossel] said. "That's how bias at the Times becomes bias in other media.

We predicted that 2012 would be the worst year in the history of Darwinism and it was. And we predict that 2013 is going to be an even WORSE year in the history of Darwinism! See: Making 2013 be the WORST year in the history of Darwinism.

Also, historically the New York Times and other major media outlets have been apostles of atheism and not objective in their reporting (see video below). These media outlets typically give atheists a free ride.

The web traffic of the New York Times was pretty stable before 2012.