tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4680321916138509918.post2695073835844638667..comments2023-05-22T04:41:33.563-07:00Comments on Question Evolution!: Is an atheist website backing down to creationists? RationalWiki has yet to accept our debate offer to debate the 15 questions for evolutionists Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4680321916138509918.post-84508097191049126052013-02-17T18:03:43.811-08:002013-02-17T18:03:43.811-08:00I have enjoyed creation.com and it has helped me o...I have enjoyed creation.com and it has helped me overcome the biases built intome by so many years of liberal schooling and assorted bunk. I have been active on many blog sites trying to promote the creationist point of view and they shoot me down some of the times. My blog is www.larrythecontrarian.blog.com and I have a section on evolution VS evil-lution. I would love to see this debate take place. However I need more assistance and while bouncing around I came to a thing on RationalWiki which pretty well summarizes the problems I have countering them. If you would be able to help me reference some more articles on your site that I can use to counter the following paragraphs which they seem to spout from memory: "The scientific method is an epistemological system for deriving and developing knowledge. It is considered the best method for making useful and practical additions to human knowledge about the physical world, and has resulted in the technological leaps made since it developed in the western world.[1] At the core of the method is the idea that the value of a hypothesis, theory, or concept is best determined by its ability to make falsifiable predictions that can be tested against an empirical reality.<br /> <br />The scientific method means that supernatural entities or concepts that are meaningless or logically contradictory cannot be included in a scientific hypothesis (not least because you can't put a sample of a god in a test-tube). Consequently, when carrying out investigations scientists assume a position of methodological naturalism." http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scientific_method I would certainly appreciate any help here if possible. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03131998328456815632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4680321916138509918.post-26390949175303560652013-02-17T07:49:40.379-08:002013-02-17T07:49:40.379-08:00Ian Dell,
Are you willing to have a debate cente...Ian Dell, <br /><br />Are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists (see: http://creation.com/15-questions )<br />via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.<br /><br />If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: http://login.meetcheap.com/conference,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod<br /><br />If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua<br /><br />There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer and carry through with the debate. 15 questions for evolutionistshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14858214883301865096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4680321916138509918.post-33247786790400273122013-02-17T04:09:29.496-08:002013-02-17T04:09:29.496-08:0015 Questions creationists won't accept the ans... 15 Questions creationists won't accept the answers to. The only question unanswered is,'Did God create evolution?'Ian Dellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09023368167062276285noreply@blogger.com