Questions:
1. Why is a Christian woman a VERY excited creation evangelist?
2. Why do so many people find Darwinism and atheism so boring, irrelevant and depressing?
A VERY excited Christian lady creation evangelist
A letter he received today from his girlfriend:
Sweetheart,
I sent emails to all my friends to visit Creation.com.
One sent me her reply already. She checked out Creation.com. She's my best friend. Her name is XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX. And also my fifteen year old cousin XXXX's younger brother XXXX. I hope God will touch the heart of some of my friends. Hehehe this is exciting, sweetheart.
Love,
XXXXX
My dear atheist and evolutionist friends, isn't this the sweetest letter you have ever read? Who could resist a letter from a creationist sweetheart such as this? Nobody my evolutionist friends! She knows how to win friends and influence people. You clearly don't! That is why evolutionism is shrinking in the United States and why biblical creationism is exploding in the world. See: Global biblical creationism
And the sad thing about atheism, my atheist friend, is that there is a significant shortage of atheist woman relative to atheist men so you probably do not have an atheist girlfriend to help you spread atheism and evolutionism! See: Where are all the atheist women?
And even if you did have one of the few atheist women as a girlfriend, she is probably a difficult feminist who doesn't want to help you do anything! Atheism and Darwinism are such dreary, lifeless and unpleasant religions. Is it any wonder atheism is filled with quarrelsome, socially challenged people who are at each others throats so often? See: Battle of the sexes within atheism
It is not surprising that atheist and liberal evolutionists have sub-replacement fertility rates. Arrogant men and sulky feminists generally don't have many kids! See: Why are the years 2012 and 2020 key years for creationist and pro-lifers?
And I ask you this question again evolutionists and atheists, "Why is young earth creationism so exciting and Darwinism so boring?" See: Why is the young earth creationist Rachel McDonald so excited?
Atheist and evolutionist dogma - still boring and depressing!
Evolutionists, if you want to make evolutionism exciting, try satisfactorily answering the 15 questions for evolutionists. You still can't do it!
See:
Decline of internet atheism
How stale and boring is evolutionary indoctrination? Is the public fooled or are they suspicious? What is the trend?
Jesus vs. Richard Dawkins and PZ Myers - Jesus wins!
The stench of evolutionism and Richard Dawkins vs. the sweet smell of Jesus Christ - Jesus wins!
Creation Ministries International blows past Richard Dawkins in terms of their website traffic.
Why are young earth creationists happy during Christmas and atheists so glum?
Creation Ministries International website resources
Creation vs. evolution answers
Question Evolution! Campaign
15 questions for evolutionists
Responses to the 15 Questions: part 1 - Questions 1-3
Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 4–8
Responses to the 15 Questions: part 2 - Questions 9-15
Refuting evolution
Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: Godless religions
Evidence for Christianity
Creation Ministries International Question Evolution! Videos
My atheist wife of 22 years helped me through cancer, and despite arthritis stood with me at the 2012 Giants victory parade. We are still madly in love, best friends, and compliment each other perfectly.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to be an angry little man. I pity you.
Gridlore,
DeleteA few points:
1. We know that Darwinism and atheism have been spread through deception. The atheists Charles Darwin and Ernst Haeckel were both caught in lies spreading Darwinism.
Prior to Charles Darwin publishing his evolutionary racist work On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life, Darwin wrote in his private notebooks that he was a materialist, which is a type of atheist. Charles Darwin’s casual mentioning of a ‘creator’ in earlier editions of The Origin of Species appears to have been a merely a deceitful ploy to downplay the implications of his materialistic theory. See: http://creation.com/charles-darwins-real-message-have-you-missed-it
The March 9, 1907 edition of the NY Times refers to Ernst Haeckel as the "celebrated Darwinian and founder of the Association for the Propagation of Ethical Atheism."
Noted evolutionist Stephen Gould wrote the following regarding Ernst Haeckel's work in a March 2000 issue of Natural History:
"Haeckel’s forceful, eminently comprehensible, if not always accurate, books appeared in all major languages and surely exerted more influence than the works of any other scientist, including Darwin…in convincing people throughout the world about the validity of evolution... Haeckel had exaggerated the similarities [between embryos of different species] by idealizations and omissions. He also, in some cases — in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent — simply copied the same figure over and over again.…Haeckel’s drawings never fooled expert embryologists, who recognized his fudgings right from the start. Haeckel’s drawings, despite their noted inaccuracies, entered into the most impenetrable and permanent of all quasi-scientific literatures: standard student textbooks of biology... Once ensconced in textbooks, misinformation becomes cocooned and effectively permanent, because…textbooks copy from previous texts.... [W]e do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks!"
And we have no proof and evidence that your testimony is true.
But even if it is true, we know that history and social science data show that atheism is a causal factor for depression, uncharitableness, human suffering and mass murder so your anecdotal claim is not impressive. See: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/12/young-earth-creationists-are-happier.html and http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-communism
2. You have not shown that I am a man, small of stature or angry. And given the evidence I gave. your demeanor and your lack of compelling evidence, you seem to be angry and have a chip on your shoulder.
Gridlore. Your right he does seem angry that the world is not the way he wants it to be.
ReplyDeleteAnd to you "15 questions" In answer to your second point (The first paragraphs are rehashed creationist nonsense and pseudo science) Yes he has not shown you to be a man, I think anyone would have difficulty in proving that. Also volume is no indicator of worth, your article contains a lot of words but little else.
Tester McMail,
DeleteI have seen plenty of people make things up on the internet. I certainly have no proof that the story about his supposed wife ever happened. Atheists constantly demand proof and evidence about historical events and then do not accept reasonable evidence.
Yet, Gridlore wants me to accept his story about his supposed wife at face value. I am not going to do that given the history of atheists/evolutionists engaging in deception. This is especially true since atheists have a history of uncharitableness and have shown themselves to be the biggest mass murders in history. See: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/12/young-earth-creationists-are-happier.html and http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-communism
And even if his story about his wife is true, it is merely anecdotal. The social sciences and history show that atheists behave worse than Christians. Atheists organizations are not known for building hospitals and atheists give less to charity per capita than Christians even if we don't count church donations. See: http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/12/young-earth-creationists-are-happier.html and http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-communism
Next, your voodoo psychological analysis of me via the internet is not at all compelling. There are plenty of cranks in the psychology field and the empirical results that the psychology field is displaying is unimpressive. See: http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1979-31736-001 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3901068
Third, are you an evolutionist? If so, are you willing to have a debate centered around the 15 questions for evolutionists (see: http://creation.com/15-questions )
via a recorded oral debate which would be distributed to tens of thousands of people.
If you are confident in your evolutionary beliefs, please make the necessary arrangements via this free chat room: http://login.meetcheap.com/conference,89538844 You can make the necessary arrangements with the chat room moderators Shockofgod or VivaYehshua. Alternatively, you can email Shockofgod via his YouTube email at http://www.youtube.com/user/shockofgod
If you want to know more about the debate, any and all questions should be directed to Shockofgod or VivaYehshua
There will be no future communication with you via this blog until you accept this debate offer and carry through with the debate.
J, Genovese,
ReplyDeleteIf memory serves, and I believe it does, I told you that you need to accept our debate offer to have your comments posted.
You know what you need to do.